IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 210 CWP-29401-2017 Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 JABARJUNG SINGH ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Bhogal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 19.12.2013 (Annexure P-3) whereby his pension was stopped w.e.f. 30.03.2013 and order dated 19.07.2017 whereby his representation for restoration of pension was rejected. 2. Learned State counsel submits that State has already resorted provisional pension of the petitioner, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid statement, however, submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to avail remedies as permissible by law after adjudication of his appeal against conviction. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.28 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29401-2017 -2- 4. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with aforesaid liberty. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE November 27, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.28 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document