Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18207 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3353 of 2025 Petitioner :- Udai Pratap Singh Respondent :- U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Thru. Chairman Cum Managing Director Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Neerav Chitravanshi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Shri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for the U.P. Power Corporation. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to pay the amount of Gratuity, Leave Encashment, Computation of Pension. ii. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to give Pension from April of 2019 to the petitioner. iii. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to pay interest on delay payment of gratuity, leave encashment, computation of pension and arrears of pension." 3. Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel on the basis of instructions submits that the petitioner has been paid his all admissible dues, but this fact has been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner by submitting that payment of admissible dues/post retiral dues have not finally been paid to the petitioner till date, though some payment has been made after lapse of substantial period without having any cogent reasons, therefore, the petitioner is entitled for the interest on the delayed payment. 4. 4. Be that as it may, since no formal order has been given to the petitioner in respect of the aforesaid prayer of the petition, therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. Chief Engineer (Hydel), U.P. Power Corporation Limited, 6TH Floor, Shakti Bhawan Extension 14, Ashok Marg, Lucknow taking all the pleas and grounds, which are available to him for disposal of the representation annexing therewith copy of the relevant documents in support of his claim and earlier representation, if any, within a period of fifteen days and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified/computerized copy of this order along with representation. The decision, so taken on the representation of the petitioner, be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench