Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13038 (AP)

NunnaBapuVittal, v. State of AP,

CRLP/2609/2022 · 2025-02-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010155992022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2609/2022 Between: Nunnabapuvittal, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. M R S SRINIVAS 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2609/2022 ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ respondents Nos.1 to 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in DVC.No.02 of 2021 on the file of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tanuku, West Godavari District. 2. Heard Sri A.Srikanth Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri MRS Srinivas, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners, by dispensing the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court. 4. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal petition is disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. However, the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. However, 3 the petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court in their defence. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.02.2025 UPS 4 28 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.2609 of 2022 Dt.06.02.2025 UPS