AMIT KUMAR AKA VEER JATAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAIL/2617/2025 · 2025-03-27
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17844 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2617 of 2025 Applicant :- Amit Kumar Aka Veer Jatav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Durgesh Kumar Verma,Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Durgesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 47 of 2025, under Sections 69 of B.N.S., registered at Police Station Zaidpur, District Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 07.02.2025 alleging therein the the informant/ complainant was in a loving relationship with the applicant and the applicant repeatedly made physical relationship with her under allurement of marriage but thereafter he declined to marry her. In the statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS, the informant reiterated the F.I.R. version. The informant declined to undergo medico legal examination. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the informant stated that she is aged 20 years and she was in contact with the applicant for two years and the applicant established physical relationship with her on the pretext of false promise of marriage but later on the applicant and his family members declined to marry her. After her break-up with the applicant, when her family members settled her marriage with some other person, the applicant posted her objectionable photographs on Facebook and also sent the same to her fiance. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 08.02.2025. The relevant extracts of case diary have been annexed with the bail
application wherein the investigating officer has recorded that the informant could not produce any photographs posted on Facebook and she could not show any audio or video recordings or any other material which may support the allegation levelled by her in the FIR or in the statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS.
It has been stated that the investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant on 22.02.2025. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is a young man who has has no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since 08.02.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Amit Kumar Aka Veer Jatav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 27.3.2025 (Manoj K.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench