[2025:JHHC:15066] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3991 of 2025 ------ Mogla @ Gulam Mustafa, aged about 40 years, son of S. K. Rajak, resident of Jairam Pur, Post Lal Gola, Police Station Lal Gola, District Mursidabad, State West Bengal .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 11-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.137 of 2023 (S) registered under Section 17 (b), 21 (b), 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal business of brown sugar and he supplied brown sugar to the co-accused persons and 41.04 grams of brown sugar and cash of Rs.2,60,000/- has been recovered in connection with this case. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner is involved in four other cases as well. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.03.2025. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is also involved in four other cases of similar nature, there is every chance of the petitioner being involved in sell and purchase of brown sugar again, if admitted to bail. It is, therefore, submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail at this stage. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner of being involved in sell and purchase of brown sugar habitually, as well as his criminal antecedent, this Court is of the considered view that this is not a fit case where the above-named petitioner be released on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected at this stage. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/