Bontha Rama Krishna v. The State of A.p., rep. by P.P.,
CRLRC/728/2013 · 2025-09-10
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13035 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13035 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010154842013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 728/2013 Between:
1. BONTHA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O.KOTESWARARAO, R/O.VENKATAPATHI COLONY, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P REP BY P P, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. BATHULA SRINU MITAY KOTTU SRINU, S/O.SAMBASIVARAO, R/O.NAGARJUNA COLONY, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DIST. 3. TADIKONDA SRINIVASARAO
GANDULURI SRINIVASARAO, S/O.KOTESWARARAO, R/O.GANDULURI VILLAGE, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 4. PASUPULETI SRINIVAS MYKEL JONSON MYKEL SRINU, S/O.KOTAIAH, R/O.VADDAVALLI, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DIST. 5. SHAIK RAFFI, S/O.MOHIDDIN, R/O.KANKANALAPALLI VILLAGE, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 6. KURAKULA SAMBASIVARAO
SAMBAIAH, CHANDRAIAH, KOTHAPETA, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto file this criminal
2
revision petition against the order passed by the learned the Spl. Session Judge Cum IV Addl. Dist., & Sessions Judge Guntur Dt.12-3-2013 in Crl.MP No.520 of 2012 in SC No.330 of 2012 for the following grounds among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 1136 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in SC No.330 of 2012 on the file of the Special Sessions Judge Cum IV Addl. Dist., & Sessions Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the criminal revision case before this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 4647 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the petitioner / proposed respondent as respondent No.7 in Crl.R.C.No.728/2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 995 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the registry in Crl.R.C.No.728/2013 to return the material of lower court record on the file of IV Addl. District and Sessions Court, Guntur to complete the trial in S.C.No.330/2012 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 728/2013
ORDER:-
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 12.03.2013 passed in Crl.M.P.No.520 of 2012 in S.C.No.330 of 2012, passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge- cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur.
2. Heard. Perused the record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous due to the disposal of S.C.No.330 of 2012 on 09.02.2018.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH
4
40 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:728 OF 2013 Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH
5
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:728 OF 2013 PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
24.
11.09.2025 TMR, J
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J SCH