Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130341 (ALL)

RANA PRATAP v. U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. THRU. CHAIRMAN LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/3302/2025 · 2025-03-26

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17446 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3302 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rana Pratap Respondent :- U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Thru. Chairman Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrish Kumar Gaur Counsel for Respondent :- Neerav Chitravanshi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Shrish Kumar Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties consider the case of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Executive Engineer from the date when the juniors to the petitioner have been considered and promoted, with all consequential benefit." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2/ competent authority and this Court may direct opposite party no.2/ competent authority to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.2 i.e. Chairman, U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., 14, Ashok Marg, Shakti Bhawan, Lucknow/ competent authority taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of two weeks from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 26.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench