Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
2025:CGHC:19049
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 723 of 2019 Sharad Rawal S/o Shri Himmat Lal Rawal Aged About 43 Years Previously Working On The Position Of Director, Registered Office At Main Road, Bapa Gali, Station Road, Main Road Kargi Road, Kota Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 – State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Master, Police Station Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 2 - Tara Yadav S/o Sarju Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Chandli, Lalpur, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : None, though served
Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 28/04/2025
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“1. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.04.29 10:23:09 +0530
2 / 2 kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the entire criminal proceeding and impugned First Information Report (F.I.R.) No 33306004190156 dated 01/03/2019 (Annexure- P/8) filed by the Police Station, Mungeli (C.G.) whereby the Petitioner has been accused of offences punishable under Sections 420 & 506 of the Indian Penal, in the interest of justice.
2. To initiate a police enquiry against the complaint and other associated person who are threatening the petitioner and family members of the petitioner’s family.
3. To provide the police protection to the petitioner and family member of the petitioner as their life is in danger.
4. That any other order that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice be awarded to the applicant.”
2. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, when the matter is called out.
3. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter.
4. As per the office report, notice issued to the private respondent has also been served and no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent to contest the petition.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on this count alone.
6. Copy of this order shall send to the trial Court for necessary information.
7. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu