Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130317 (ALL)

RAM BABU PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/2640/2025 · 2025-04-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18841 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2640 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Babu Prajapati Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prince Singh,Dinesh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2. The present application has been filed against the summoning order dated 22.04.2016 and N.B.W. dated 19.12.2017 passed in Misc. Case No. 1034/2023, related to Complaint Case NO. 61/2016 U/S 138 N.I.Act, 1881, Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao (Rama Prajapati Vs. Ram Babu). 3. Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing at some length submits that grievance of the appellant shall be redressed in case liberty is granted to the appellant to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). 5. The application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench