SYED IZHAR ALI v. SRI RAJEEV KUMAR, CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL/ MECHANICAL) U.P. JAL NIGAM (NAGRIYA) LKO. AND ANOTHER
CAPL/842/2025 · 2025-07-23
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42284 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 842 of 2025 Applicant :- Syed Izhar Ali Opposite Party :- Sri Rajeev Kumar, Chief Engineer (Electrical/ Mechanical) U.P. Jal Nigam (Nagriya) Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sabir Ali Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for respondents.
2. The present contempt application has been filed for alleged
disobedience
of
orders
dated 20.02.2025/24.02.2025 passed by this Court in Writ A No.883 of 2025.
3. Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel appearing for respondents filed affidavit of compliance duly sworn by Sri Rajeev Kumar, Chief Engineer (Electrical/Mechanical), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for respondents informed the Court that pursuant to the direction issued by the writ Court, the respondent has passed order dated 18.07.2025 by which joining of the applicant is treated from 20.02.2025 as Pump Operator
in
the
office
of
Chief
Engineer (Electrical/Mechanical), U.P. Nal Nigam Nagriya, Lucknow. The copy of the order dated 18.07.2025 has been annexed along with the affidavit of compliance as Annexure CA-3. He further submitted that the order of the writ court has been complied with.
4. This Court vide order dated 14.07.2025 rejected the deferment application with cost of Rs.100/- and the respondent no.1 was directed to deposit the cost amount before the Senior Registrar of this Court. It is evident from the record that the cost amount has already been deposited by respondent no.1 as directed vide order dated
14.07.2025.
5. Considering the contents of the order of writ Court as well as the affidavit of compliance and the order passed by the respondent authority dated 18.07.2025, this Court is of the view that since the decision has been taken by the respondent authority on the representation of the applicant therefore, the present contempt application has lost its efficacy.
6. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.7.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench