Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18906 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3370 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rambabu Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Forest Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Singh,Himanshu Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Sri Satish Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2, 3 & 4. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(I) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties more specially to opposite party No.3 to pay the amount of leave encashment along with 12% interest for the delayed period till the date of actual payment is made to the petitioner. (II) To issue a, writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.4 to provide NOC to the petitioner for making payment of his leave encashment amount." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance the petitioner has preferred representation dated 24.01.2025 to the opposite party No.3, which has been annexed as Annexure No.7 to the writ petition, but no appropriate decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Managing Director, U.P. Forest Corporation, Lucknow and the direction may be issued him/her to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Managing Director, U.P. Forest Corporation, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him for disposal of the representation annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition, preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench