Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130302 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. REVENUE LKO AND ORS.

WRIC/2898/2025 · 2025-03-26

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17346-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2898 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Revenue Lko And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhupendra Prakash,Manish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned Counsel for the Electricity Corporation says that though the demand notice/recovery citation has been challenged there are assessment orders which have been passed but are not under challenge. The said orders and receipt of notice under Section 3 of the U.P. Government Electrical Undertakings (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958 have been provided to learned Counsel for the petitioner today in Court by her. 3. In view of the above, the petitioner may avail the prescribed remedies now that he has been provided a copy of the said documents. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 26.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench