APHC010154562022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 721/2022 Between: 1. NIDANA MURALI BAI, W/O SAMPATHIRAO MANI AGE. 65 YRS, OCC. RETD GOVT EMPLOYEE R/O FLAT NO 101, SAI BANDU ENCLAVE, DOOR NO 6-14-5 CHINNA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM PRESENTLY RESIDING AT POWAI, NEAR BMC SCHOOL MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA 2. SAMPATHIRAO MANI, S/O LAKSHMIPATI AGE. 67 YRS, OCC. RETD GOVT EMPLOYEE, R/O FLAT NO 101, SAI .BANDU ENCLAVE, DOOR NO 6-14-5 CHINNA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM PRESENTLY RESIDING AT POWAI, NEAR BMC SCHOOL MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DEVATA SRIRAM MURTHY, S/o Narayana Rao Aged 53 years, Occ. Not known, R/o C-3 (East), Yarada Park, Sriharipuram, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toCivil Revision Petition against the common order, dated 31st July 2019 passed in I.A.No.374/2014and IA 142/2018 in O.S.No.1531/2012 on the file of the Hon'ble VIIth Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the proceedings in the main suit 0.S. 1531/2012 pending disposal of the main case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BONDILI RAVIKIRAN SINGH Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: At the time when the matter was taken on 04.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was posted to 11.08.2025. Even on 11.08.2025, when the matter was called, there was no representation and the matter was posted to 28.08.2025, under the caption “For Dismissal”. Though the matter was listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”, none appeared for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in the present case. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 28.08.2025. GSS