Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130250 (ALL)

BALI BHADRA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF ADDL. ENERGY SOURCE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/2933/2025 · 2025-03-27

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17679-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2933 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bali Bhadra Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Addl. Energy Source Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shesh Ram Mishra,Lalit Narayan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nishant Shukla Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by non-forwarding of his file by opposite party no.4 to opposite party no.5. 3. Learned counsel for U.P. New and Renewable Energy Development Agency, Sultanpur states that it is not to be forwarded for good and valid reasons. We do not wish to enter into this controversy. 4. Let the Director, U.P. New and Renewable Energy Development Agency, Lucknow/ respondent no.2 look into the matter on a representation to be submitted by the petitioner and do the needful, as may be necessary and required under law, but with expedition, say within three weeks. 5. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 27.3.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench