APHC010154652019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6752/2019 Between: 1. MANDLA SWAMI REDDY, S/O. HUSSAIN REDDY, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 28-794/A3, NGO COLONY, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDYAL TALUQ (U) POLICE STATION, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE BANK OF BARODA, NANDYAL BRANCH, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGAR. 4. THE CANARA BANK, NANDYAL BRANCH, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANGAR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6752 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in intending to register the separate FIR based on the complaints made by the respondent No.3 and 4 instead of treating such complaints as statements under section 162 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 161/2019 is contrary to section 154 Cr.P.C. and also violation of article 14, 20,21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to register the multiple FIRs based on the complaint made by the respondent No.3 and 4 and treat such complaints as statements under section 162 Cr.P.C. in FIR.No. 161/2019 in the interests of justice and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.08.2025 Pmk 3 04 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6752 OF 2019 Date: 04.08.2025 Pmk