VIJAY KUMAR OBJECTION FILED v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER LUCKNOW and 2 OTHERS
WRIC/1003205/2002 · 2025-09-12
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1003205 of 2002 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised. The case is listed peremptorily under the head,
"These cases shall not be adjourned". None for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel is present.
2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 12, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranav Pandey (Irshad Ali,J.) Vijay Kumar Objection Filed .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Lucknow And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench