Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23233 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2865 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikram Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Desh Mitra Anand,Prateek Rawat,Utkarsh Anand Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kuldeep Srivastava Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Initially, there was some confusion as to whether this bail application should be decided by this Bench or with some other Bench. A report was called for from the Registrar, Listing of this High Court and he has submitted a report dated 22.04.2024 that the bail application should be decided by this Bench. 2. Heard Shri Desh Mitra Anand and Shri Utkarsh Anand, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned AGA-I and perused the records. 3. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.758 of 2021, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow. 4. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.08.2021 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant had paid money to Shine City Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Company, Lucknow for purchasing a plot but office of the company was closed thereafter. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has further been stated that the applicant is neither a Director nor a share holder or principle position holder in the aforesaid Company. The FIR mentions that the applicant used to work as an agent of the Company. 6. The applicant's involvement in 18 other cases has been disclosed in para-18 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and he has already been granted bail in 15 cases. All the cases, in which the applicant is involved, are similar in nature. 7. Learned AGA-I has vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is said to be merely an agent of the Company and he did not hold any principle position in the Companyand that he has already been granted bail in 15 other cases of similar nature, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Vikram Singh Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 23.4.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench