Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130199 (ALL)

ARVIND KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/1655/2025 · 2025-03-26

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17189 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1655 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Raghvendra Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Anurag Kumar Maurya, learned State counsel and Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the Land Management Committee concerned. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "I. Issue an order or direction to the opposite party no. 2 i.e. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Tahsil- Kunda, District-Pratapgarh to decide the case bearing no. 2349/2024 Computerized case No. T202402570102349 (Arvind Kumar and Others versus State Of U.P. and Others) under section 32/38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in respect of Village-Ugapur, Pargana- Bihar, Tahsil- Kund, District-Pratapgarh, which is pending before him since 19/09/2023 as expeditiously within stipulated time." Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and period of pendency of the case in issue, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2/Sub-Divisional Officer, Tahsil- Kunda, District-Pratapgarh to consider and decide the 2349/2024, Computerized case No. T202402570102349 (Arvind Kumar and Others versus State Of U.P. and Others) instituted under section 32/38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party, say within a maximum period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, as according to Rule 36(6) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, an endeavor shall be made to conclude the proceedings of such nature within the period of 45 days. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 26.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench