IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7340 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== 1. Bibi Rasina Khatoon @ Rasina Khatoon wife of Late Md. Mustkim Resident of Village- Mithila Deep Tole balba PS- Jhanjharpur, Dist- Madhubani 2. Sarukh Pamariya son of Late Md. Mustkim Resident of Village- Mithila Deep Tole balba PS- Jhanjharpur, Dist- Madhubani 3. Manisha Khatoon Wife of Md. Raja Pamriya Resident of Village- Mithila Deep Tole balba PS- Jhanjharpur, Dist- Madhubani 4. Nazam Pamriya son of Md. Kyamul Pamariya Resident of Village- Mithila Deep Tole balba PS- Jhanjharpur, Dist- Madhubani 5. Fajil Pamariya son of Ibrahim Pamariya Resident of Village- Mithila Deep Tole balba PS- Jhanjharpur, Dist- Madhubani 6. Sakila Khatoon wife of Md. Kyamul Pamariya village- Pakri, Ps- Rajivraj, Dist- Saptri Nepal, At P/A- Mithila Deep tole, Balba, Ps- Jhanjharpur, dist- Madhubani 7. Ravina Khatoon wife of Fajil Pamariya village- Pakri, Ps- Rajivraj, Dist- Saptri Nepal, At P/A- Mithila Deep tole, Balba, Ps- Jhanjharpur, dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Meena Khatoon Wife of Md. Fafuk Pamariya village- Mithila Dip tole Balba, Ps- Lakhnaur, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramchandra Jha Raman, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 3. There is allegation of matrimonial cruelty and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7340 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 2/2 harassment for dowry. Petitioners are in-laws of opposite party no.2. They are victim of over implication. Allegation is general and omnibus in nature. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Supaul in Complaint Case No. 603/2019, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. shashi/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T