Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13017 (GAU)

POONAM CHETRI v. BIKRAM CHETRI

I.A.(Crl.)/533/2025 · 2025-05-25

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010110442025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/533/2025 POONAM CHETRI W/O- BIKRAM CHETRI, D/O- LATE DHAN BAHADUR CHETRI, R/O- H.NO- 154, KRISHNA NAGAR, P.O- SILPUKHURI, P.S- CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-03, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASAM, PRESENTLY RESING AT NO-1 BONDA GRANT, BIRKUCHI, NEAR ASSAM CARBON LTD. P.S- NOONMATI, GUWAHATI-26, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS BIKRAM CHETRI S/O- LATE PREM BAHADUR CHETRI, R/O- AMRIT NAGAR, H.NO-15, P.O- BASISTHA, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HUSSAIN, MS. M PATHAK,MR. B HUSSAIN,MRS R KAKATI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. O P BHATI, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 26.05.2025 Heard Ms. M. Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. K. Gupta, learned counsel for the sole respondent. This application has been filed praying for correction of the order dated 20.05.2025 passed Page No.# 2/2 by this court in Criminal Revision Petition No. 497/2024. In paragraph 9 of the said order, it has been mentioned as “ In the case in hand, if the order granting interim maintenance is reversed, then the entire proceeding would come to an end.......” Ms. Pathak has submitted that there was an error because the line should have been “In the case in hand, if the order granting interim maintenance is reversed, then the entire proceeding would not come to an end.......”. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the sides. This court is of the opinion that the error should be corrected for the ends of justice. Henceforth, the paragraph 9 of order dated 20.05.2025 passed by this court in Criminal Revision Petition No. 497/2024 be read as under: “In the case in hand, if the order granting interim maintenance is reversed, then the entire proceeding would not come to an end.......”. This order shall form a part of the order dated 20.05.2025 passed by this court in Criminal Revision Petition No. 497/2024. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant