Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130158 (MAD)

P.Vasanthakumar v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/8649/2025 · 2025-03-28

J Nisha Banu, S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.8649 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.8649 of 2025 P.Vasanthakumar ...Petitioner -Vs- 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Tahsildar (Monitoring Committee), Aalangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvarankulam Panchayat Unin, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Executive Officer, Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Alangudi, Pudukkottai District. 5.M/s.Anna Hospital, Represented by Proprietor, Dr.Sathish, Opposite Taluk Office, Alangudi Town, Pudukkottai District. ...Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8649 of 2025 PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the 5th Respondent in the `Government Poramboke Street` comprised in Survey No.287/1, situated at Alangudi, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Balasubramanian For R1 & 2 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) Heard Mr.E.Balasubramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 3 to 5 is dispensed with. 2.By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 3.The petitioner claims that he has sent a representation to the official respondents herein on 20.01.2025 seeking to remove the encroachment made in the petition mentioned property. But till today, the representation of the petitioner is kept pending without any progress. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8649 of 2025 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the fourth respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.01.2025 by giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the fifth respondent and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. (J.N.B.,J.) (S.S.Y.,J.) 28.03.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The Tahsildar (Monitoring Committee), Aalangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvarankulam Panchayat Unin, Pudukkottai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8649 of 2025 J. NISHA BANU,J. and S.SRIMATHY.J ta W.P.(MD)No.8649 of 2025 28.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis