HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15826/2009 Harlal Singh Son Of Shri Ganesharam, Village Khaylia Ki Dhani, Post Office Badwasi, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Tripathi, Addl. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/02/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to make payment of the gratuity amount along-with interest. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the writ petition and submitted that excess amount of gratuity was paid to the petitioner, and in terms of the orders passed by the authorities, the petitioner was called upon to refund the same to the respondents and appear before the Treasurer, in person, for the purpose of releasing of his due amount of gratuity. Learned counsel submits that till date the petitioner has failed to appear (2 of 2) [CW-15826/2009] before the authorities for the purpose of his identification. Learned counsel submits that in absence of identification of the petitioner, the needful exercise cannot be done. 4. Considering the factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to appear before the authorities concerned for completing necessary formalities for releasing/refund of the gratuity amount. 5. All applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. 6. In case, the petitioner appears before the respondent- authorities within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the authorities concerned to pass necessary orders with regard to gratuity of the petitioner along-with interest in terms of Rule 89 of the Rajasthan Pension Rules, 1996. 7. Since the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court, Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner on his residential address mentioned in the memo of writ petition for their intimation/information. 8. Even in case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by any action of the respondents, he would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/62