IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.359 CR-2580-2022 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025 NEERAJ JINDAL AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus PAWAN KANSAL AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Aayush Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Mona Goyal, Advocate for lrs of respondent No.1. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) At this stage, counsel for the petitioners submits that the compromise has been effected between the parties and the eviction application has since been withdrawn before learned trial Court, he does not want to pursue with the present revision petition and the same be dismissed, as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (ARCHANA PURI) 07.11.2025 JUDGE Sonu Saini Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No Sonu 2025.11.07 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document