PRAHLAD ROY KHANDAL S/O SHRI GOPAL LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4659/2025 · 2025-04-03
Anand Sharma, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13009 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13009 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:15059-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 4659/2025
1. Prahlad Roy Khandal S/o Shri Gopal Lal, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 329, Pach Ki Taraf, Ward No.30, Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
2. Gajendra Kumar Verma S/o Shri Prahlad Verma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Raigran Mohalla, Malpura, District Tonk Presently Resident Of Shastri Nagar, Ward No.33, Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
3. Rakesh Kumar Pareek S/o Shri Ramesh Chand, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 159, Near Chobiyan Ki Haveli, Purani Tehsil Malpura, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Department Of Local Bodies, Jaipur.
3. District Collector, Tonk.
4. Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Malpura, District, Tonk.
5. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Malpura, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma with Ms. Sunita Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, Additional Advocate General HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 03/04/2025
1. Heard.
[2025:RJ-JP:15059-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-4659/2025]
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge allotments/ regularization of plots on strip of land.
3. If that be the case of the petitioner, the remedy lies in challenging the order of regularization of land in favour of those in whose favour allotments have been made. This is not a cause for challenge to the existing auction proceedings. The petitioner is given liberty to file separate petition with clear details.
4. This petition is dismissed with the cost of Rs.25,000/-. Remaining cost of Rs.25,000/- shall be refunded to the petitioner.
(ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ Sanjay Kumawat/Daksh-249(s)