FAKIRE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/2865/2025 · 2025-04-03
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130061 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130061 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18631 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2865 of 2025 Petitioner :- Fakire Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arjun Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Arjun Singh Somvanshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4/Gram Sabha concerned. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s) :-
"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned order dated 24.02.2025 passed by opposite party no.2 in Case No.113/2025 (Computerized Case No.D202510330000113) (Fakire Versus Gaon Sabha and others), u/s 67(5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the order dated 26.11.2024 passed by opposite party no.3 in Case No.3995/2023 (Computerized Case No.T-202310330203995) (Gram Sabha Saidpur Versus Fakire) under section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as contained in Annexure No. 1&2 to the writ petition. ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to demolish the house of the petitioner and not to recover the amount as shown in the impugned
order dated 26.11.2024 from the petitioner, as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition." In terms of earlier order of the Court dated 25.03.2025, District Magistrate, Hardoi is present before the Court. Personal affidavit of District Magistrate, Hardoi filed in the Court today is taken on record. Taking note of the contents of the personal affidavit particularly that appropriate land has been provided to the petitioner namely Fakire s/o Niranjan and others namely Devidin s/o Kallu, Ashish Kumar & Harisharan both sons of Late Takur Prasad and Babu s/o Puttu, this Court is of the view that the instant petition has now become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infrucutous. Before parting, this Court feels it appropriate to record appreciation of the District Magistrate, Hardoi and accordingly, appreciates his concern for the poor people of the Village concerned, to whom the appropriate land has been provided for their shelter, and also undertakes to provide similar benefit to others in the District.
Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench