Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17343-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 125 of 2025 Appellant :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Horticulture And Food Processing Lko. And 2 Others Respondent :- Smt. Hajrun Nisha And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent :- Vinod Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. (I.A. No.01 of 2025-Delay Condonation Application) 1. Heard 2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the instant Special Appeal. 3. No objection has been filed against this application. 4. Cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of application is sufficient. 5. Application is allowed and delay in filing the instant Special Appeal is condoned. (Order on Appeal) 1. Heard Shri Prafull Yadav, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Shri Vinod Kumar Shukla, the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The instant Special Appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 has been filed by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 18.12.2023 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ A No.9675 of 2023 "Smt. Hajrun Nisha and others vs. State of U.P. and others". 3. The aforesaid writ petition was filed by the petitioners (respondents herein) praying for a direction to the opposite parties (appellants herein) to provide salary to the petitioners in the minimum of pay scale extending the benefit of judgment and order dated 09.02.2023 passed in Writ A No.8812 of 2022 "Jai Prakash Verma and others vs. State of U.P. and others". 4. The petitioners (respondents herein) had relied upon a judgment dated 25.01.2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.16326 (S/S) of 2017 titled Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Others, which was affirmed by this Court in the Special Appeal Defective No.338 of 2019. SLP (Civil) No.2665 of 2019 filed by the State. 5. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioners (respondents herein) were casual employees and had worked as daily wagers. There is no provision for payment of minimum of the pay scale to any person appointed as daily wager. There is no sanctioned post of Mali in the district. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, it transpires that the petitioners (respondents herein) have worked as Mali for more than a decade and when a writ petition filed by another similarly situated person, Ramesh Kumar Yadav has been allowed and the judgment so rendered has not been interfered with in the Special Appeal, we find it difficult and are not persuaded to take a different view. 7. Therefore, we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the Special Appeal is hereby dismissed. (A. K. Srivastava-I,J.) (A. R. Masoodi,J.) Order Date :- 26.3.2025/Mahesh Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench