Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13004 (AP)

The Payakaraopet Gram Panchayat, v. The Addl. Assistant Engineer,

WP/30335/2013 · 2025-07-02

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010155542013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 30335/2013 Between: 1. THE PAYAKARAOPET GRAM PANCHAYAT,, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER D.RAGHUNADHA BABU S/O LATE BHASKAR RAO, AGED 44 YEARS, PAYAKARAOPET, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ADDL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OPERATION, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LIMITED, PAYAKARAOPET TOWN VISAKHAPATNAM DSITRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LIMITED, OPERATION CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHATYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PTS.IV) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 4. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the 2 impugned Lr.No.AAE/O/PRP/F.NO./D.No.558113/16, dated 16-08-2013 as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the G.O.Rt.No.80, dated 17-01-2009 and consequential G.O.Rt.No.1190, dated 18- 07-2013 and consequentially this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 16- 08-2013 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37655 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Lr.No. AAE/O/PRP/F.NO/D.No.558113/16, dated 16- 08-2013 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 1453 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on dated 23.10.2013 in WPMP.No.37655 of 2013 in WP.No.30335 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 87578 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 3 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 03.07.2025 SNI 4 107 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.30335 of 2013 Dated: 03.07.2025 SNI