UDAI PRAKASH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3212/2025 · 2025-03-25
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130034 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 130034 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17151
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3212 of 2025 Petitioner :- Udai Prakash Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Alok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijendra Kumar Singh, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the opposite party no. 1 and Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 to 4 By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :
"i) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to determine the last basic pay of the petitioner and pay him arrears of salary and the amount of leave encashment. ii) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to pay the interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of arrears of salary and amount of leave encashment for the delayed period upto the actual payment is made."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to the order being passed in earlier writ petition an order dated 22.1.2025 (Annexure no. 3) has been passed but benefit of the aforesaid order has not been given to the petitioner till date. Sri Rishabh Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 has stated that there are some formalities which are to be completed by the petitioner and as soon as those formalities are completed, the petitioner would be given the dues as has been prayed in the writ petition. Be that as it may, if some formalities are to be completed by the petitioner the same would be intimated to him by the concerning authority at the earliest, say within a period of seven days and the petitioner shall complete those formalities at the earliest. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within two weeks
before the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Managing Director, U.P. Forest Corporation, Lucknow taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this
order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.]
Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench