Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 130020 (ALL)

NAJMI BEGUM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIA/3254/2025 · 2025-03-27

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17689 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3254 of 2025 Petitioner :- Najmi Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Nath Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Devendra Nath Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State- opposite parties no.1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 8 and Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for opposite party no.9. 2. At the very outset, Dr. Udai Veer Singh has submitted that the present petitioner being a outsource employee, so she cannot claim the benefits by filing writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The outsourcing agency is 'Kaba Swayam Sahayata Samooh' and if the petitioner is having any grievance, she may approach such outsourcing agency. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid objection being raised by Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed being not maintainable. 5. However, it is always open for the petitioner to approach her outsourcing agency for redressal of her grievance, if any. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 27.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench