HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3665 of 2023 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 31.01.2023 passed by the respondent no.4 by way of which his representation has been rejected. 2. The matter has been called in the revised list but none appears on behalf of the petitioner. 3. I have perused the record. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. However, it shall be open for the petitioner to file recall application, if the matter survives. October 10, 2025 S.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C., Daya Ram (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Altaf Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad