Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12989 (CHH)

VIJAY KUMAR RAJAK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1788/2025 · 2025-03-17

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12516 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1788 of 2025 1 - Vijay Kumar Rajak S/o Late Maniram Rajak Aged About 65 Years Retired Dhobi, Posted At OfÏce Of Principal And Superintendent Government Ayurved College Chikitsalay Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh R/o Katiyapara Juna Bilaspur, P.S.City Kotwali District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Ayurved, Yog And Prakratik Chikitsa, Yunani, Siddh And Homeopathy (Ayush) Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.03.18 17:45:49 +0530 2 3 - Principal And Superintendent Government Ayurved College Chikitsalay Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Joint Director Pension And Account Treasury Department Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nilu Kumari Singh, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Ms. Shailja Shuikla, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 17.03.2025 1. The limited relief that the Petitioner seeks for in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to the Respondents for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioner, he has made his claim in the light of the recent decision of this High Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of all similarly placed person in the light of the aforesaid decision of this High Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib