MS JAY MATA DEE ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ASHARFI PRASAD MANDAL v. JHARKHAND BIJALI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/1945/2022 · 2025-08-07
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12988 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12988 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:22361-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1945 of 2022
M/s. Jay Mata Dee Enterprises, Adityapur Industrial Area, Seraikella- Kharsawan, through its proprietor Asharfi Prasad Mandal
... … Petitioner
Versus
1. Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, through its Managing Director, Ranchi
2. The Managing Director, Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Ranchi
3. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Area, Hazaribagh
4. The Senior Manager (F&A), Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Area, Hazaribagh
5. The Electrical Executive Engineer (W & MM), Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Area, Hazaribagh
6. The Electrical Executive Engineer (Technical), Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Area, Hazaribagh
7. The Deputy General Manager-cum-E.S.E, Jharkhand Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Electric Supply Area, Hazaribagh
8. M/s. Singh Electricals Works, Gamharia, Seraikella-Kharsawan
9. M/s. Priyam Enterprises, Near Bharat Gas Agency, Kadru, Doranda, Ranchi
10. M/s. Jay Prakash Singh, Mahuwadangal, Dumka
11. M/s. Nandani Steel Industries, Rohini, Deoghar
12. M/s. Sealco, 9/A, Jagdish Nath Roy Lane, Near Hedua Park, Kolkata
13. M/s. Deepak Electricals, Tripathi Colony, Doranda, Ranchi
14. M/s. Satnam Enterprises, Dhurwa, Ranchi… Respondents ----- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate For the Respondent-JUVNL : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Sr. SC
Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to Sr. SC -----
05/07.08.2025 I.A. No. 1202 of 2023
The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
2.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the present interlocutory application, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
3.
I.A. No. 1202 of 2023 is accordingly allowed.
2025:JHHC:22361-DB
2
W.P.(C) No. 1945 of 2022
4.
In view of the order passed in I.A. No. 1202 of 2023, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) N.A.F.R. Manish/Ritesh