SHIV PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BASIC EDU. CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/3179/2025 · 2025-03-25
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129877 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129877 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17030 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3179 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Civil Sectt. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma,Sumer Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party nos. 1 and 3, Sri Rishabh Tripathi, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of opposite party nos. 4 and 5 and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of opposite party no. 6. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 4 and 5 that one reasoned order has been issued to the petitioner but he did not receive the same. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no formal termination order has been given to the petitioner. Be that as it may, since, the formal termination order has been issued, therefore, the petitioner may prefer a fresh representation to B.S.A., Sitapur taking all pleas and grounds which are available to him, within a period of two weeks and the B.S.A., Sitapur shall consider and dispose of the same by speaking and reasoned order by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of one month and decision thereof or any such order which is said to have been passed earlier be provided to the petitioner forthwith. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench