Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129874 (ALL)

ASHUTOSH KUMAR RAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. (HOME) U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/3237/2025 · 2025-03-27

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17608 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3237 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Home) U.P. Govt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. parties to consider the representation of the petitioner submitted by him on 05.02.2025 declaring his and his family members assets and properties before taking any coercive action against him and pass appropriate order according to law expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.2 i.e. The Director General, U.P. Vigilance Establishment, TCV 44, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of ten days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 27.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench