Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17507 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2855 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hanoman Respondent :- Additional Commissioner, Administration, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitesh Pratap Singh,Nagendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Shri Gyanendra Pathak, Advocate and Shri Adarsh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate have filed Vakalatnama in Court today on behalf of the respondent no. 3 which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for following main reliefs: "i. Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order dated-11.02.2025 passed by the opposite party no.1 i.e. The Additional Commissioner, Administration, Devi Patan Mandal, District- Gonda in Revision No.275/2025, under sectin-219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, by which the revision of the petitioner was rejected on the ground of maintainability as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition. ii. Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the opposite party no.3 not to disturb to the petitioner from his peaceful possession and maintain status quo till the disposal of the writ petition." 4. At the outset, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents stated that the order impugned is not liable to be interfered with by this Court in view of statutory remedy of appeal available under the statute itself. Reference has been made to Section 210 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (in short "Act of 1901"). 5. In continuation and based upon Section 210 of Act of 1901, he further submitted that order impugned dated 11.02.2025 can be assailed before the authority concerned. 6. The aforesaid remedy available to the petitioner has not been disputed. 7. Taking note of the statutory remedy being available to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the statute itself. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 27.3.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench