Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2025 DAILYLAW 12987 (KAR)
SMT MEENAKSHI K M v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/1192/2024 · 2025-02-21
S R Krishna Kumar
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12987 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12987 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7872 WP No. 1192 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1192 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MEENAKSHI K.M AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS W/O LATE V. GOPINATH
2. GIRIJAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O MUNNIAPPA
3. MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O KRISHNAPPA PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT: NO. 118, 3RD MAIN 7TH CROSS, MARUTHI NAGARA, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE - 560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. NAYANA TARA B.G, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VARTHUR POLICE STATION BANGALORE
2.
MR. PAVAN G AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS S/O LATE V GOPINATH HAVING HIS OFFICE AT:
NO.34, GROUND FLOOR, SY NO 4/5B Digitally signed by MAYAGAIAH VINUTHA Location: HIGH COURT KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7872 WP No. 1192 of 2024 PATEL LAYOUT, 10TH CROSS BALAGERE ROAD, VARTHUR BANGALORE - 560 087. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHIMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 21/02/2025)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET BY R1 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-L IN CRIME NO. 0130/2021 FILED IN CC 626/2022 BEFORE II ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU, BENGALURU RURAL FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 427 AND 448 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:
"a. Call for records pertaining to CC 626/2022 pending on the file of the II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, Bengaluru Rural; b. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ,
order, or direction of similar nature quashing the Chargesheet by Respondent No.1 produced at Annexure-L in Crime No.0130/2021 filed in CC 626/2022 before II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, Bengaluru Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 427 and 448 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7872 WP No. 1192 of 2024 c. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ,
order, or direction of similar nature quashing
order dated 10.2.2022 in CC No.626/2022 passed by Learned II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, Bengaluru Rural produced at Annexure-K; d. Grant such other reliefs as the facts and circumstances of the case may warrant, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that respondent No.2-defacto complainant is none other than the son of petitioner No.1 and petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the maternal grand parents of respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 filed the instant compliant, which is registered as an FIR in Cr.No.130/2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 427 and 448 r/w Section 34 of IPC. According to respondent No.2- complainant, petitioners are alleged to have committed trespass into the residential premise as can be seen from the impugned complaint as Annexure-H dated 22.05.2021. Further, in addition to the aforesaid compliant, civil proceedings in O.S.No.1373/2022 are pending between the petitioners and respondentNo.2; so also arbitration proceedings between
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7872 WP No. 1192 of 2024 petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are also pending before the Arbitral Tribunal. It is, therefore, clear that the dispute between the petitioners and respondentNo.2 is essentially, predominantly and overwhelmingly of a civil nature/character, which is sought to be given a criminal colour/flavour by respondent No.2 which is impermissible in law as held by the Apex Court in the following cases: (i) Naresh Kumar and Another. v. The State of Karnataka and another, reported in (2024) INSC 196. (ii) Lohit Chaturvedi and Others. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another., reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 171 . 3. In addition, thereto, it is pertinent to note that impugned compliant reads as under:
"gÀªÀjUÉ, ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¸À¨ïE£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgï ªÀvÀÆðgÀÄ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ. EAzÀ, f.¥ÀªÀ£ï ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï «.UÉÆÃ¦£Áxï, 19 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA 539, 1£Éà PÁæ¸ï, FzÁÎ gÀ¸ÉÛ, ªÀvÀÆðgÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-87 ¥ÉÆÃ-8088532584 eÁw-§®fUÀ. - 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7872 WP No. 1192 of 2024 ªÀiÁ£ÀågÉÃ, «µÀAiÀÄ: «ÄãÁQë ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀ §UÉÎ zÀÆgÀÄ. ** *** ** £Á£ÀÄ ªÉÄîÌAqÀ «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è £À£Àß ¸ÀºÉÆÃzÀj ¥ÀªÀ£À²æÃ gÀªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÀÄÝPÉÆAqÀÄ ©PÁA ¥ÀzÀ«AiÀÄ 1£Éà ªÀµÀðzÀ°è ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ ªÀiÁrPÉÆArgÀÄvÉÛãÉ. £À£Àß vÁ¬Ä ²æÃªÀÄw «ÄãÁQë gÀªÀgÀÄ FUÉÎ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 4 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À »AzÉ PËlÄA©PÀ PÁgÀtUÀ½AzÀ £À£Àß vÀAzÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÀªÀÄä£ÀÄß ©lÄÖ ºÉÆÃVzÀÄÝ, £ÀªÀÄä vÀAzÉ «gÀÄzÀÝ ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÉÒÃzÀ£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀt zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ, ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀÅ ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀİègÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-04- 2021 gÀAzÀÄ £ÀªÀÄä vÀAzÉ «.UÉÆÃ¦£Áxï gÀªÀgÀÄ wÃjPÉÆArzÀÄÝ, «ÄãÁQë gÀªÀgÀÄ £ÀªÀÄä vÀAzÉAiÀÄ CAvÀåQæAiÉÄUÉ ¸ÀºÀ §A¢gÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
F ¢£À ¢£ÁAPÀ: 23-05-2021 gÀAzÀÄ ¨É½UÉÎ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 6- 30 UÀAmÉAiÀÄ°è £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀİè E®èzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è «ÄãÁQë, FPÉAiÀÄ vÁ¬Ä ²æÃªÀÄw VjdªÀÄä, ªÀÄĤAiÀÄ¥Àà, C©ügÁªÀiï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ KPÁKQ £À£Àß ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ CwPÀæªÀÄ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ªÀiÁr ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ ©ÃUÀ, UÉÃmï ©ÃUÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀİèzÀÝ PÀ¨ÉÆÃqïð C£ÀÄß dRAUÉÆ½¹ UÀ¯ÁmÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. PÀÆqÀ¯Éà «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß w½zÀÄ £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ ºÉÆÃV £ÉÆÃqÀ¯ÁV ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀİèzÀÝ ¨É½îAiÀÄ ¥ÀÆd ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼ÀÄ, a£ÀßzÀ MqÀªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÀªÀÄUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ D¹ÛAiÀÄ zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼ÀÄ PÁt¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. £À£Àß ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ CwPÀæªÀÄ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ªÀiÁr, ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß dRAUÉÆ½¹gÀĪÀ ªÉÄîÌAqÀ C¸Á«ÄUÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÝ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä PÉÆÃgÀÄvÉÛãÉ. ªÀAzÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ, vÀªÀÄä «±Áé¹. 4. Further, a perusal of the impugned complaint, FIR, statement of witnesses, documents, charge sheet etc., cumulatively establish that the offences alleged against
- 6 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7872 WP No. 1192 of 2024 petitioners are not been made out by respondent No.2- complainant and consequently, continuation of the impugned proceedings as against the petitioners would amount to abuse of process of law warranting interference in the present petition. 5. In the result, the following:
ORDER
i) The criminal petition is allowed.
ii) The entire proceedings in C.C.No.626/2022 pending before II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, arising out of FIR in Crime No.130/2021 registered by respondent- Police, qua the petitioners, are hereby quashed. SD/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 85