Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12986 (CHH)

RAM DEO v. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED

WPS/1849/2025 · 2025-03-18

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12778 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1849 of 2025 1 - Ram Deo S/o Ramdular Aged About 53 Years Caste - Rajwar, R/o Village Krishnapur, P.S. Surajpur, Tehsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Headquarter At Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through The Area Personnel Manager, Bhatgaon, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Mine Manager, Shivani Mine, Bhatgaon, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ...Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 18/03/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner who is presently AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.03.19 10:31:30 +0530 2 working as a Driller at Shivani Mines in the respondent’s company seeking a direction towards the respondents to take appropriate decision on the representations submitted by the petitioner, by which, the petitioner is seeking correction of his date of birth in its official service record as 27/06/1971. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the petitioner came to know about the discrepancies in the service record of wrong recording of date of birth where the date of birth of the petitioner is wrongly recorded as 26/03/1966, he immediately submitted a representations before the respondents starting from 16/06/2015 till 24/10/2024 on several occasion by annexing relevant documents including admission register and mark-sheet of primary school, but, the respondents are not taking any decision on the said representations filed by the petitioner till date. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that if the said representations are still pending, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. It appears from the representations that the petitioner is apprising his grievance about the fact that his date of birth has been wrongly recorded since 16/06/2015, but till date, no decision has been taken on his representations, hence, the writ 3 petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the representations filed by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of forty days from today. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep