CHANDRAKALA v. SRI DHARMENDRA KUMAR, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL ALAPUR DISTRICT AMBEDKAR NAGAR
CAPL/814/2025 · 2025-04-25
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 129852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 814 of 2025 Applicant :- Chandrakala Opposite Party :- Sri Dharmendra Kumar, Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur District Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Tulsi Ram Yadav,Alok Kumar Pathak,Shiv Prasad Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Case is called out. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
2. Sri Vinayak Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent informs that proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has already been decided by the Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedakar Nagar on 22.4.2025 (photo copy of the same is taken on record), therefore,
order of the writ court has been complied with and present contempt application has lost its efficacy.
3. Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the respondent and contents of the order dated 22.4.2025, this Court is of the view that order of the writ court has already been complied with, therefore, present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.4.2025 GauraV/- Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench