Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129844 (ALL)

RAM KOMAL v. SRI PADMESH SRIVASTAVA, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL JALALPUR, DISTT. AMBEDKAR NAGAR

CAPL/811/2025 · 2025-04-25

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24231 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 811 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Komal Opposite Party :- Sri Padmesh Srivastava, Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Distt. Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Tulsi Ram Yadav,Alok Kumar Pathak,Shiv Prasad Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Case is called out. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant. 2. Sri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent informs that proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has already been decided by the respondent on 24.4.2025 (photo copy of the same is taken on record), therefore, order of the writ court has been complied with and present contempt application has lost its efficacy. 3. Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the respondent and contents of the order dated 24.4.2025, this Court is of the view that order of the writ court has already been complied with, therefore, present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 GauraV/- Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench