Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12983 (ALL)

SMT RAMA SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/3014/2025 · 2025-02-13

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21248 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3014 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Rama Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned order dated 21.09.2023 (Annexure No. 1 to the present writ petition) passed by respondent no. 2." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in appeal filed against the final decree passed in suit under Section 116 by the respondents, an interim injunction has been granted without hearing the petitioner. 4. Since, the appeal is pending before respondent no. 2, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application for vacating the interim order. 5. In case, such application filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad