Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129811 (ALL)

SMT. NISHAT FATMA v. BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. ITS CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS

A227/1558/2025 · 2025-03-24

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16734 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1558 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Nishat Fatma Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla,Shyam Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party Nos.1 and 2 and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief :- "(i) issue order or direction to the opposite party no.1 to consider and decide the interim relief application dated 14.02.2025 in Revision No.470/2025, Smt. Nishatfatma V/s Naib Tehsildar and others within stipulated period, as contained as Annexure No. 1 to this petition, as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." Taking note of the facts as indicated and also the fact that the petitioner is an old lady aged about 60 years, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the authority concerned to consider and decide the application for interim relief within a period of 15 days, if possible, from the date of production certified copy of this order, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the parties. It is expected that the entire proceedings of Revision No.470 of 2025 (Smt. Nishat Fatma Vs. Naib Tehsildar and others), be concluded after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench