Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129804 (PNJ)

MAMTA v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

CWP/12542/2025 · 2025-11-26

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 287-5 Mamta and others State of Haryana and another CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Ms. Jaishree Kaushik, Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.04.2025 passed by the Director General of Police, Haryana whereby a single list in connection to allotment of Districts/Units/Ba merging the merit list of Female Constables (General Duty) and Female Constable, (HAP through a separate recruitment process. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the that the order impugned in the present petition has already been withdrawn by the Director General of Police, Haryana vide order No.11476 18.07.2025. 3. Counsel aforesaid development, the present writ petition itself has been rendered infructuous. 4. Learned State Counsel 5. In view of the above, t been rendered infructuous. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 26.11.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12542 Date of decision: and others VERSUS Haryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ s. Jaishree Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.04.2025 passed by the Director General of Police, Haryana whereby a single list in connection to allotment of Districts/Units/Ba merging the merit list of Female Constables (General Duty) and Female Constable, (HAP-Durga-1) notwithstanding the fact that they were recruited through a separate recruitment process. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the that the order impugned in the present petition has already been withdrawn by the Director General of Police, Haryana vide order No.11476 Counsel for the petitioners further aforesaid development, the present writ petition itself has been rendered Learned State Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the above, the present petition been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 12542-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.11.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ or the petitioners. Haryana. The instant petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.04.2025 passed by the Director General of Police, Haryana whereby a single list in connection to allotment of Districts/Units/Battalions was issued by merging the merit list of Female Constables (General Duty) and Female 1) notwithstanding the fact that they were recruited Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that the order impugned in the present petition has already been withdrawn by the Director General of Police, Haryana vide order No.11476-520/E(II)-I dated further contends that in view of the aforesaid development, the present writ petition itself has been rendered does not dispute the aforesaid facts. he present petition is disposed of as having Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.11.28 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document