IN THE HIGH CO 124 VEERPAL SING STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON HON Present: Mr. ANUPINDER SIN The (Annexure P-21) 2. Learn petitioners had app 28.12.2001 wherei the total amount. was only 12 years They had sought c same has been erro 3. Issue 4. At the Advocate General, Sandhu, Advocate submits that the tr the legal heirs and any application. H COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARY CWP-30136-2025 DATE OF DECIS SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate for the R SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have challenged 21) whereby their request for transfer Learned counsel for the petitioners ad applied for a plot and the Letter o wherein the cost of the plot was Rs.4, ount. He unfortunately expired on 28. years of age while petitioner No.2 wa ht change of ownership and issuan en erroneously declined by the impugn Issue notice to the respondents. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Arun eneral, Punjab accepts notice on behalf vocate accepts notice on behalf of the transfer would be effected only if rs and in the instant case, the mother o ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 ECISION: 11.11.2025 … Petitioners ... Respondents UPINDER SINGH GREWAL EPAK MANCHANDA r the petitioners. ged the order dated 10.07.2024 ransfer of the plot has been rejected. tioners submits that father of the etter of Intent was issued to him on Rs.4,16,000/-. He had paid 10% of on 28.03.2002 when petitioner No.1 o.2 was 11 years of age at that time. issuance of allotment letter but the mpugned order. s. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, Assistant behalf of respondent No.1. Ms.Avin lf of respondents No.2 and 3 and only if an application is made by all other of the petitioners has not made 2024 the m on % of No.1 time. t the stant Avin and y all ade SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.11.11 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-30136-2025 -2- 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a fresh application on behalf of all the legal heirs including the mother of the petitioners. 6. Heard. 7. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the event of the petitioners along with their mother preferring an application for change of ownership/transfer of plot, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents in accordance with their policy, expeditiously. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 11.11.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.11.11 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document