Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129795 (MAD)

Chinnapappa v. The District Registrar

WP(MD)/8394/2025 · 2025-04-03

V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 Chinnapappa ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Registrar, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Kannivadi Sub -Registrar Office, Kannivadi, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to delete the entry in encumbrance certificate mentioned as “ fpiuak; &.2>00>000/- jpz;Lf;fy; khtl;l Ml;rpah; e.f.vz;.82/2017/19/B4 dated 18.07.2014d; gb tof;F epYitapy; cs;sJ” and consequently direct the second respondent to entertain the document presented for further transaction in respect of SF.No.98/110A, 98/7, 98/8B & 98/9 situated at Kothapuli Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Aruljenifer For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate (for R1 & R2) Mr.G.Suriyananth Government Advocate (for R3) O R D E R Heard Mr.A.Aruljenifer, Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam, learned Government Advocate and Mr.G.Suriyananth, learned Government Advocate, for the respective parties. 2. This is the second round of litigation before this Court. 3. This writ petition relates to the property situated at S.F.Nos. 98/110A, 98/7, 98/8B and 98/9 of Kothapuli Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. The petitioner secured the said property by way of two documents, namely, a settlement deed, dated 24.10.2013, executed by her father, P.Perumal Bogan and by way of partition cum release deed, dated 30.10.2014 executed by one Kaliyappan and eight others. 4. The petitioner alienated the property in favour of one Minor.Saravana, S/o.Kaliyappan. At the time of registration, an 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 undertaking was given by the petitioner to clear any encumbrance that may be found in and over the property. The encumbrance certificate reflected that the proceedings had been initiated by the District Collector of Dindigul District in Na.Ka.No.82/2017/19B4, dated 18.07.2014. In order to find out as to what are the proceedings, which is referred to in the encumbrance certificate, the petitioner applied to the District Collector under the Right to Information Act. He was informed by the District Collector office that there is no such proceedings pending on the file of the District Collector. The petitioner moved this Court by way of a writ petition in W.P(MD).No. 25902 of 2024. In the said writ petition, a direction was given to the Tahsildar to conduct an enquiry and submit a report to the Sub- Registrar at the earliest. Further, a direction was given to the Sub- Registrar to act in accordance with the report filed by the Tahsildar. Despite this direction, as there has been no further progress, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present writ petition. 5. Mr.G.Suriyananth has produced the written instructions from the authority/Thasildar, Dindigul West Taluk, which states as follows: 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 “ jpz;Lf;fy; Nkw;F tl;lk;> nfhj;jg;Gs;sp fpuhkk;> uaj;J Gy vz;fs; KiwNa 98/7, 8gp> 9> 10V Mfpatw;iw gj;jpug;gjptpw;F Vw;f muRjug;G gpujpthjpfshd khtl;l gjpthsUf;F cj;jputplf;Nfl;L jpUkjp.rpd;dghg;gh vd;gth; khz;gik nrd;id cah;ePjpkd;w kJiu fpisapy; hpl; tof;F W.P(MD).No.8394 of 2025 njhlh;e;Js;shh;. Nkw;gb tof;F njhlh;ghf vdjwpf;ifapid gpd;tUkhW rkh;g;gpj;Js;Nsd;. ,t;tof;fpd; thjpahd jpUkjp.rpd;dghg;gh vd;gth; fd;dpthb rhh;gjpthsiu Nkw;gb nrhj;Jf;fs; njhlh;ghf tpy;yq;fr;rhd;wpy; Fwpg;gplg;gl;Ls;s (jpz;Lf;fy; khtl;l Ml;rpah; e.f.vz;.82/2017/19/gp4 ehs; 18.07.2014-,d;gb tof;F epYitapy; cs;sJ) thrfj;ij ePf;f cj;jputplf;Nfhhp ghh;it 1,y; thjp jpUkjp.rpd;dghg;gh vd;gth; hpl; tof;F njhlh;e;jjpy; khz;gik cah;ePjpkd;wk; gpd;tUkhW Miz gpwg;gpj;Js;sJ. Nkw;gb tof;fpy; gpujpthjpfshf khtl;l Ml;rpah;-1> rhh;gjpthsh;> fd;dpthb-2> tl;lhl;rpah;> jpz;Lf;fy; Nkw;F -3 MfpNahh; Nrh;f;fg;gl;bUe;jdh;. 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 “3. In this regard, the petitioner already submitted a representation before the first respondent. In turn, the first respondent directed the third respondent to conduct enquiry and submit a report. 4. In view of the above, the third respondent is directed to conduct enquiry and submit a report before the second respondent as early as possible. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to act upon on the basis of the report submitted by the third respondent scrupulously. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.” “Nkw;gbahf> khz;gik nrd;id cah;ePjpkd;wk; W.P(MD).No.25902 of 2024 tof;fpy; toq;fpAs;s cj;jputpd;gb> ,t;tYtyfk; %ykhf thjp cs;spl;l egh;fis tprhuiz nra;Jk;> gjpTj;Jiw kw;Wk; tUtha;j;Jiw Mtzq;fis ghprPypj;Jk; mwpf;ifia fd;dpthb rhh;gjpthsUf;F mwpf;if mDg;g eltbf;if vLf;fg;gl;L tUfpwJ. ,t;thwhd epiyapy; thjp kPsTk; khz;gik cah;ePjpkd;wj;ij ehb ,e;j hpl; tof;fpid 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 (W.P(MD).No.8394 of 2025) njhlh;e;Js;shh;. ,e;Neh;tpy;> tof;fpy; M[uhfp> tl;lhl;rpah; mYtyfk; %yk; tprhuiz nra;Jk;> Mtzq;fisg; ghprPyid nra;Jk; fd;dpthb rhh;gjpthshplk; mwpf;if rkh;g;gpf;f 4 thu fhy mtfhrk; ngw;W je;J tof;fpid Kbj;J itf;FkhWk;> muReyd; fhj;jpLkhWk; Nfl;Lf;nfhs;fpNwd;.” 6. This makes it clear that there is no proceeding, as found in the encumbrance certificate, on the file of the District Collector, Dindigul. 7. The Registration Act and the Rules made thereunder do not empower the authority created under the Act to remove the encumbrance certificate, if it has been entered on the basis of valid proceedings or document. In the present case, the encumbrance certificate has been kept into the file of the second respondent on the basis of the non-existing proceedings of the District Collector. When there is no proceedings initiated by the District Collector Office, there is no question of the same being reflected in the encumbrance 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 certificate. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to delete the said entry from his file and report to this Court. No costs. 8. Call 'for compliance' on 16.04.2025. Index :Yes / No 03.04.2025 NCC :Yes / No Rmk To 1.The District Registrar, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Kannivadi Sub -Registrar Office, Kannivadi, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Rmk W.P.(MD)No.8394 of 2025 03.04.2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis