Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12979 (GAU)

SRI MADHURAM BORUAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/1665/2025 · 2025-06-05

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010109982025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1665/2025 SRI MADHURAM BORUAH SON OF LATE PRADIP BORUAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHENUKHANA SIRINGAON, P.O. AND P.S.- BATMARI, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 787053. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS), GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM CUM CHAIRPERSON OF STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003. 4:THE ADDL. CHIEF ENGINEER (PLANNING) PWD (ROADS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781003. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD(ROADS) LAKHIMPUR STATE ROAD DIVISION GHILAMARA ASSAM PIN- 787053. 6:THE ADDL. CHIEF ENGINEER PWD(P) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781003. 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 78700 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR U SAIKIA, MR. Z ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, SEC. EDU. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 06.06.2025 Heard Mr. U. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Das, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/Respondent No.2. By filing this application, the petitioner has prayed for impleadment of Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur as party respondent No.7 in the connected WP(C) 7256/2023. Having considered the grounds for impleadment of Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur and the prayer not being objected to by the learned counsel for the Opposite Page No.# 3/3 Party, I deem it appropriate to allow this application, as for proper adjudication of the connected writ petition, the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur appears to be a necessary party. Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No.7 in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant