Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12979 (AP)

GUNDLURU ABDUL KALEEM v. DEVAKI SRIRAM KUMAR

CRP/939/2023 · 2025-06-26

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

r APHC010154382023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI m FRIDAY THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR ri\/ii RFVKSIQN PETITION NO: 939 OF 2023 Petition under Section 115 of the C.P.C. Civil Revision Petition aggrieved 11-03-2014 passed the Hon'ble V Additional District by the Order, dated Judge Court at Rayachoty in E.P.No.11 / 2011 in O.S.No.8 of 2009 Between: Gundluru Abdul Kaleem, S/o.Abdul Jaleel, Aged about 36 years, Occ Business, R/o.Bus Stand Road, Rayachoty Town, Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya District, Erstwhile YSR Kadapa District. ...Petitioner/J.Dr-1/Defendant AND S/o.Dwarakanatha Gupta, Aged about 40 years, Occ Devaki Shram Kumar R/o.D.No.58/167 and 168, Battu Street, Rayachoty Town, Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya District, Erstwhile YSR Kadapa District. Business, ...Respondent/D.Hr./Plaintiff lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of Order, dated 11-03-2014 and all further proceedings in E.P.No.11 / 2011 in O.S.No.8 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble V Additional District Judge Court at Rayachoty, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: - The Court made the following Order: APHC010154382023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 939/2023 Between: Gundluru Abdul Kaleem ...PETITIONER AND Devaki Sriram Kumar ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The V Additional District Judge Court at Rayachoty. (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri. G Kondala Rao Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. Two CD Copies vna HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 I 2 0 S£f 2075 ^ . Current Section m. ORDER CRP No. 939/2023 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS