Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23861 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1270 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rekha Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kirtika Singh Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Kritika Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6, and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The petitioner is a widow daughter of the deceased employee. She claims entitlement to family pension. She has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Ms. Kritika Singh, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, they fairly contend that her claim for family pension is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent authority is
directed to decide the representation of the petitioner regarding family pension as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of
this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally
disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Kashifa Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad