Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 129774 (ALL)

KRISHNA RAKSHIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/2877/2025 · 2025-03-25

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16942-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2877 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishna Rakshit Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manu Dixit,Prashant Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. It is informed by Shri Manu Dixit, learned Counsel for the opposite party no. 3 that the petitioner had taken some loan from the opposite party no. 3 Bank. 3. The matter went to Arbitration and an order was passed by the Arbitrator attaching one-third of the salary which comes in the salary account which is maintained by the opposite party no. 4. The order was intimated to opposite party no. 4 who is represented by Shri Prashant Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel. 4. Earlier, the petitioner did not honor the order of the Arbitrator and did not deposit the due amount, but now he has deposited Rs. 35,000/-, therefore, the opposite party no. 3 has communicated to the opposite party no. 4 a no objection, as regards defreezing of the petitioner's salary account. 5. Let the opposite party no. 4 look into the matter and do the needful in the light of what has been noticed hereinabove, but positively within a period of one week. 6. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 7. Let a copy of this order be provided to learned Counsel for the parties within 24 hours on payment of usual charges. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench