Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16981 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3197 of 2025 Petitioner :- Avnish Kumar Shukla And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Nagar Vikas Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mani Tripathi,Anurag Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sriniwas Bajpai Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Shri A.M. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Sriniwas Bajpai, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3 and 4. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding/directing the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization of their service on the post of Mali i.e. class- IV post alongwith other consequential service benefits as has been given to others forthwith. ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding/directing the opposite parties to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners dated 02.12.2024 pending before them for consideration their case with respect to regularization and take decision on the same forthwith. " 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 02.12.2024 to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e., Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sitapur and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e., Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sitapur ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench