Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12976 (UTT)

DINESH CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3170/2023 · 2025-09-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8116 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS 3170/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy AG, for the State. (2) Petitioner is a Civil Contractor registered with Irrigation Department. According to him, he was awarded a contract during Financial Year 2017-18, however part of the payment has not been released so far. (3) After arguing for a while, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made a representation but no decision has been taken thereupon. He submits that petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation. (4) Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make a representation to the Executive Engineer concerned. If he makes such representation within ten days from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within four months thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.9.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.09.11 18:43:22 +05'30' 2025:UHC:8116